|  |  
            
  
              
                 
                  | Rationale |   
                    | 
                      
                        
                          
                        | We established a research 
                            and educational partnership to document Wedge-tailed 
                            Shearwater fallout and road mortality along the southeastern 
                            shore of O'ahu, involving four partners: DOFAW - HPU Pelagicos Lab - U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Oikonos 
 The Wedge-tailed Shearwater ('Ua'u  kani, Puffinus pacificus),  a seabird protected by both Federal and State statutes, breeds on O'ahu, primarily on the offshore islets along the windward coast. Fledging shearwaters  are grounded  due to collisions with utility  wires, light posts, and other structures. Shearwaters grounded on roadways are often hit by vehicles.  We surveyed a 16-km stretch of the Kalaniana'ole Hwy., spanning from Hawai'i Kai to Olomana Golf Course, (Figure 1), repeatedly during the wedge-tailed shearwater fledging season (Nov. - Dec.)  over five years (2011 - 2015) and documented year-to-year changes in the timing and magnitude of shearwater fallout. 
 
                              
                                
                                  | Figure 1. The 16-km survey of the Kalaniana‘ole  Hwy, spanning from the Olomana Golf Course (north), through Waimanalo  town, to Hawai‘i Kai (south). The map shows the location of  the Manana shearwater colony and of the Sea Life Park rehabilitation center. |  
                              In 2011, we documented 128 downed shearwaters during the fledging season (Figure 2). These results highlight the potential for high fallout along the southeast coast of O'ahu, due to the presence  of shearwater breeding sites upwind from a seaside highway and urban center (Waimanalo town). These surveys also highlighted the negative relationship between shearwater fallout and moon phase: with significantly more grounded shearwaters during nights with lower moon illumination (Pearson correlation, r = -0.61, n = 17 surveys, p < 0.005).                               
 
                                
                                  | Figure 2. Wedge-tailed shearwater fallout (number of downed birds) encountered during standardized surveys of the study area. The open circles denote the survey dates and the blue line depicts the degree of lunar illumination. |    While  fallout was widely distributed along the coastline down-wind from Manana Island in 2011, downed shearwaters were concentrated in the vicinity of the Waimanalo Beach Park (Figure 3a), an area characterized by high light post densities (Figure 3b). 
                                
                                  |  |  |  
                                  | Figure 3a. In 2011, we  documented 128 grounded shearwaters, with a hotspot of concentration at Waimanalo  Beach Park. |  Figure 3b. Map of light densities along the study area, showing the "hotspot" associated with the Waimanalo Beach Park. |  |  
 
                        
                          | Approach  With  matching funds from the State of Hawai’i DOFAW, we initiated a multi-year study of Wedge-tailed  Shearwater fallout and road mortality along the southeastern shore of O’ahu.                         Our  overarching goal is to document the timing and location of shearwater fallout during the  chick fledging season,  and to use this this information to educate the public about the threats faced by  fledging wedge-tailed shearwaters.                         Over the last four years (2012 - 2015), we have completed the following activities:  (i) surveyed a 16-km section  of the Kalaniana'ole Highway, from Hawai'i Kai to Olomana Golf Course, using standardized methods to map shearwater fallout   during the fledging season (Nov. 1 - Dec. 21) of four years (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015),  (ii) marked and resighted randomly-selected carcasses at daily intervals to quantify potential biases in the road  surveys due to carcass loss by scavenging and washout, and               (iii) disseminated  the study results via our project web-site, our facebook site, scientific presentations and public  seminars.  It is our hope that these outreach efforts will increase public awareness about  shearwater fallout and possible mitigation efforts aimed at reducing mortality. | 
                            
                              |  |  
                              | A Wedge-tailed Shearwater chick, grounded in Waimanalo town, is documented and taken to Sea Life Park for rehabilitation and release. 
 |  |  
 
                        
                          | Goals and Objectives   The  goal of this project is to develop ways to mitigate Wedge-tailed  Shearwater mortality. More specifically, this project focuses on the following  objectives: * Road  Surveys:  Following the protocol used in 2011, we  surveyed  a 16-km stretch of the Kalaniana'ole Hwy., every 3 days, during the shearwater fledging season. These surveys provided information on the spatial and temporal distribution  of  shearwater fallout and mortality along the  study area, and highlighted potential “hotposts” of concentrated mortality. * Carcass  Loss Study:   To  investigate the loss of carcasses due to scavenging and wash out by rains, we marked a randomly selected  subset of 54 specimens with color string and number tags. The daily resighting of these marked specimens facilitated mark-recapture data for the development of correction factors to account for  scavenging and loss. 
 * Dissemination of Project Results: We  disseminated project findings to a wide audience using a variety of media. In  addition to posting our results online, we completed the  following activities:
 - Seminar at HPU (May 2013):  Disseminated research results to HPU students to stimulate  student volunteers for Sea Life Park  rehabilitation program. - Hawai'i Conservation Conference (July 2013):  Devon Francke gave an oral presentation to  conservation practitioners and resource managers. - Public Seminar at Hanauma Bay (October 2013):   Hyrenbach gave a public presentation to stimulate public awareness of the plight of the fledging shearwaters at the Hanauma Bay Lecture Series.  - Pacific Seabird Group Conference (February 2016):  Devon Francke gave an oral presentation to  conservation practitioners and resource managers. | 
                            
                              |  |  
                              | 
                                Fledging shearwaters encounter a range of obstacles along the Kalaniana'ole Highway, including street utility poles, lights, and wires.                           |  
                              |  |  |  
 
                        
                          
                            | Results Road Surveys:  Throughout the four years (2011 – 2015) of this ongoing study, we have  completed 68 surveys of a 16-km section  of the Kalaniana'ole Highway, from Hawai'i Kai to Olomana Golf Course, and have documented 231 shearwater carcasses (Table  1).                              
                                
                                  
                                    
                                | YEAR | #    Carcasses Detected | Mean    (S.D.) / Median (Range)  | Dates    of Fallout |  
                                    
                                | 2011 | 128 | 7.7 (9.7) / 4 
                                    (0 - 30) | Nov 14 - Dec 
                                    22 |  
                                    
                                | 2012 | 60 | 3.5 (2.9) / 3 
                                    (0 - 9) | Nov 9 - Dec 21 |  
                                    
                                | 2013 | 11 | 0.6 (1.0) / 0 
                                    (0 - 3) | Nov 24 -Dec 9 |  
                                    
                                | 2014 | 13 | 0.5 (0.5) / 0 
                                    (0 - 1) | Nov 18 -Dec 18 |  
                                    
                                | 2015 | 19 | 1.1 (1.2) / 1 
                                    (0 - 3) | Nov 15 - Dec 
                                    21 |  
                                    
                                | Total | 231 |   |   |  
                                  
                                    | Table 1. Summary of road surveys conducted yearly from November 3 through  December 21, showing the number of shearwater carcasses detected, the mean  (S.D.) / median (range) number of carcasses encountered per survey, and the range of dates  when fallout was documented.  |    Because  the number of shearwater carcasses documented during standardized surveys  varied widely (from 0 to 30), we log-transformed the data as follows: y’ = log  (y + 1). We analyzed the log-transformed data using analysis of variance  (ANOVA), with one fixed factor (year) and two covariates (Julian date, and percent  of the lunar disk that was illuminated). The ANOVA test revealed that shearwater fallout varied significantly from year to year, and  in relation to the lunar cycle; yet, there was no significant date effect  (Table 2).  
                                
                                  
                                    | Source | df | F-ratio | P value | Result |  
                                    | YEAR | 4 | 1.129 | < 0.001 | Year-to-year differences |  
                                    | DATE | 1 | 0.112 | 0.277 | No signifficat date effect |  
                                    | MOON | 1 | 1.656 | < 0.001 | Significant lunar effect |  
                                    | Error | 78 |   |  |  |  
                                  
                                    | Table 2. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) model results, showing the coefficients and  associated  p values  for the three tested effects: year, date, moon illumination. The bold font  denotes significant results. Overall model R squared = 0.45. |  An  exploration of yearly patterns of fallout reinforced the important influence of  the lunar cycle, as evidenced by the multi-modal distributions, with peak  fallout during low moon periods and no fallout during high moon periods (Figure 4).  Three of the four years (2011, 2012, 2014, 2015) had bimodal fallout distributions,  with a primary and a secondary peak separated by a period of no deposition,  when moon light approached 100% of the lunar disk. The fifth year (2013) was characterized  by a single peak, preceding the full moon.     
 
                                
                                  
                                    | 
                                      Figure 4A-D.  Relative fallout (% shearwater carcasses encountered on road)  and moon light (% of the lunar disk illuminated), during  standardized surveys of the study area (17 surveys per year; highlighted by the open circles). |  Carcass  Loss Study :  Live and dead shearwaters were documented  using a standardized protocol, and a randomly-selected subset of carcasses were  tagged and left on the road, as part of the scavenger removal trial. Over the  three years of this study, we marked a randomly–selected subset of 65  shearwater carcasses with an aluminum tag attached to the feet with color  string, and left them where they were first encountered.  Carcasses were resighted daily, starting in day 1 and until they  reached day 9, when they were removed.  The resighting data collected during a four-year study (2012 – 2015) revealed that the loss rate varied as a  function of the amount of time the carcass had been left on the road (number of  days since first marked), from 23.1% for fresh carcasses (day 1), to 0.0%  for old carcasses (day 6 and day 9).   Altogether, these results suggest that predators (cats, rats, mongoose)  scavenge fresh carcasses, but are less attracted to them after they have been on the road for 3 days  (Figure 5).    
 
                                
                                  
                                    | 
                                      Figure 5.  Probability of resighting a carcass (proxy  for loss rate), as a function of the number of days since it was marked. The  error bars denote one S.D. above / below the mean, and the numbers in brackets  indicate the sample size (number of birds). |  We synthesized  the carcass loss data for the entire study (2012-2015) using a Weibull model,  with an additional variable to account for the non-linear influence of time on the  resighting probability (Figure 6). The best-fit model had a significant intercept  (4.619	 +/- 0.059 S.E.), a significant slope (-0.491	 +/- 0.068 S.E.) and a  significant power exponent (0.788 +/- 0.135 S.E.). Moreover, because the power exponent  was different from 1 (t = 5.8270, p = 0.0011), it revealed that the age of a  carcass (number of days since marking) had a non-linear influence on the  probability of resighting that carcass. Namely, newer and older carcasses were  lost at higher and lower rates, respectively.   
 
                                
                                  
                                    | 
                                      Figure 6.  Cumulative probability of resighting a  tagged carcass (proxy for loss rate),          as a function of the number of days  since marking. The circles show the observations and the lines indicate  the 95% Confidence Intervals of the model prediction.  |  
   
 |  
                            |  |  
 
                          
                            | Pelagicos Contact  David Hyrenbach                                 Other Pelagicos People  Devon Francke, Dan Rapp, Sarah Youngren, John Johnson   Partners 
                                
                                  | 
                                    Norma Creps 
 | 
                                    Keith Swindle 
 |  
                                  | 
                                    Department of Land & Natural  ResourcesDivision of Forestry and Wildlife
 1151 Punchbowl Street  Rm 325
 Honolulu, HI 96813
 | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service4401 N Fairfax Drive, MS: LE-3000
 Arlington, VA 22203
 |  |    |  |  |